Democracy is a weak form of government.  A constant conflict exists between those in power, whose primary objective is to obtain more power, and the wishes of the general population to retain a fair and just government. 

Key to continuation of a democracy is balance of power.  The objective of those who wish to obtain more power is to tear down the balance of power.  In recent years, in this country, those whose objective is to obtain more power have succeeded in reducing checks and balances.  This is a result of the smartest and best positioned leaders seizing opportunity and executing a long term plan. 

Our Founders set up Congress to be the primary place of power in our government.  It is Article I of our Constitution and it follows that those seeking to obtain more power must first reduce the power of Congress in order to achieve their objectives.  Secondly, those seeking more power must reduce the stabilizing influence of the courts. 

Those seeking more power favor a more authoritarian form of government.  Loyalty and support of a strong leader brings favor, over and above traditional power, to loyal power seekers.  A shift to a more authoritarian form of government has taken place in recent years in this country.  Here are some examples.

The two most recent Presidential impeachment trials have provided substantial evidence that, considering the modern day political climate, a President essentially cannot be impeached and removed from office.  This alone substantially increases the power of our most powerful leader. 

The leader of Senate has refused to allow open discussion on many high profile pieces of legislation.  For many issues, Congress has ground to a halt.  That has weakened the branch of government created by Article I of the Constitution.  This is in addition to the fact that many important issues such as gun rights, reproductive rights, and campaign finance reform have been punted to the court system rather than legislated by Congress.  Fewer actions by Congress, by default, give more power to the other two branches of government.  Extrapolation of this trend gives much more power to the President. 

Congress’s ability to oversee appointments to the Supreme Court has been seriously weakened.  The President may now appoint biased judges at will.  Note the open bias of the most recent Supreme Court nominee and the 9th grievance against King George III in the Declaration of Independence railing against biased judges.  When the court is packed with biased judges by a President who seeks to be an authoritarian leader, the court becomes a rubber stamp for the wishes of the President. 

Our laws indirectly allow the power shift. 

This reality in hand, the average American should consider that the authoritarian ruler outcome was not intent of our Founders and is in direct opposition to the principles laid out in the second sentence of the Declaration of Independence. 

The second, third, and fourth sentences of the Declaration of Independence give Americans groundwork to oppose the concept of authoritarian rule.  Article V of the Constitution provides an opportunity for changing the laws. 

The fundamental question is ‘does government serve at the pleasure of the people or are the people obligated to tolerate their government’?

This site, first of all, addresses the history and current landscape of possible changes to our Constitution.  Secondly, it seeks thoughtful comments from a non-partisan point of view.  Thirdly, it provides a framework for changes that may create a more desirable balance of power. 

Your opinion counts

%d bloggers like this: